AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. DAS et al
| AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
| ANITA DAS, SUNUNTA C. DAS and INDRA J. DAS |
| SUNUNTA C. DAS, ANITA DAS and INDRA J. DAS |
| AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 2:2018cv01613 |
| April 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| C. DARNELL JONES |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDERED THAT SAID MOTION IS GRANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURTS ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS ANITA DAS, SUNUNTA DAS, AND INDRA J. DAS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 3/30/21. 3/31/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING 14 MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BAD FAITH AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 5/8/19. 5/9/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ON OR BEFORE 12/27/2018 PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE A SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 12/6/2018. 12/7/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
