PROUT v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
| MARY PROUT |
| TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. and TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC. |
| 2:2018cv03004 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Hearing: STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR 9/20/2018 08:45 AM IN JUDGE BARTLE'S CHAMBERS BEFORE HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE III. ADDITIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.(km, ) |
| Filing 15 Defendant's ANSWER to #14 Amended Complaint by TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC. (CALLAHAN, DENNIS) Modified on 9/5/2018 (lisad, ). |
| Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT together with Jury Demand against TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC., filed by MARY PROUT.(ti, ) |
| Summons Issued as to TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC. One Original Forwarded To: Counsel on 8/15/18 (ti, ) Modified on 8/15/2018 (ti, ). |
Filing 13
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF KENNETH W. PEARSON, ESQUIRE, TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 83.5.2(b) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 8/9/18.8/10/18 ENTERED AND ECF APPLICATION & COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF ADAM J. KRESS, ESQUIRE, TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 83.5.2(b) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 8/9/18.8/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, ) Modified on 8/10/2018 (ti, ).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF MICHAEL K. JOHNSON, ESQUIRE, TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 83.5.2(b) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 8/9/18.8/10/18 ENTERED AND ECF APPLICATION & COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kenneth W. Pearson by MARY PROUT. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-12975233.). (HURD, RYAN) |
| Filing 9 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Michael K. Johnson by MARY PROUT. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-12975220.). (HURD, RYAN) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Adam Kress, Esquire by MARY PROUT. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-12975151.). (HURD, RYAN) |
| Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III Status Conference held on 8/7/18. (ti, ) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Kenneth Pearson, Esquire filed by MARY PROUT..(HURD, RYAN) Modified on 8/9/2018 (ti, ). |
| Filing 5 First MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Michael Johnson, Esquire filed by MARY PROUT..(HURD, RYAN) Modified on 8/9/2018 (ti, ). |
| Filing 4 First MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Adam Kress, Esquire filed by MARY PROUT.(HURD, RYAN) Modified on 8/9/2018 (ti, ). |
| Filing 3 Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. (CALLAHAN, DENNIS) Modified on 7/25/2018 (ti, ). |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC..(CALLAHAN, DENNIS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. from Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania together with Certificate of Service. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 181731) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form, #4 Case Management Track Form)(ti, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
