BF ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. SAATH FIVE, INC. et al
| BF ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, LLC |
| SAATH FIVE, INC., SHIVANI PATEL, SEJAL PATEL, AMIT PATEL, CHIRAG PATEL, TEJAL PATEL, HETAL C. PATEL, ASHISH PATEL, DHRUBESH PATEL, JIGAR PATEL and HETAL PATEL |
| 2:2018cv03312 |
| August 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A REQUEST WITH THE CLERK FOR ENTRY OF A DEFAULT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 55 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. IF THE REQUEST FOR DEFAULT IS NOT FILED WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, THE COURT WILL ENTER AN ORDER DISMISSING THE CASE AGAINST THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 9/27/18. 9/28/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BF ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, LLC re: James G. Robinson served Summons and Complaint upon AMIT PATEL, ASHISH PATEL, CHIRAG PATEL, DHRUBESH PATEL, HETAL PATEL, HETAL C. PATEL, JIGAR PATEL, SHIVANI PATEL, TEJAL PATEL, SEJAL PATEL, SAATH FIVE, INC. by Personal Service. AMIT PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; ASHISH PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; CHIRAG PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; DHRUBESH PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; HETAL PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; HETAL C. PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; JIGAR PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; SHIVANI PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; TEJAL PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; SEJAL PATEL served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018; SAATH FIVE, INC. served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018. (va, ) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service: Summonses returned unexectued, as to AMIT PATEL, ASHISH PATEL, CHIRAG PATEL, DHRUBESH PATEL, HETAL PATEL, HETAL C. PATEL, JIGAR PATEL, SHIVANI PATEL, TEJAL PATEL, SEJAL PATEL, SAATH FIVE, INC. (va, ) |
| Filing 3 12(b) Procedural Order (CJL) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 Identifying Corporate Parent MTY FRANCHISING USA, INC. for BF ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, LLC., filed by PLFF BF ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, LLC.(kw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMIT PATEL, ASHISH PATEL, CHIRAG PATEL, DHRUBESH PATEL, HETAL PATEL, HETAL C. PATEL, JIGAR PATEL, SHIVANI PATEL, TEJAL PATEL, SEJAL PATEL, SAATH FIVE, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number PPE182669.), filed by PLFF BF ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Exhibit A1, #3 Exhibit A2, #4 Exhibit A3, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G1, #11 Exhibit G2, #12 Exhibit G3, #13 Exhibit G4, #14 Exhibit G5, #15 Exhibit H1, #16 Exhibit H2, #17 Exhibit H3, #18 Exhibit I, #19 Exhibit J1, #20 Exhibit J2, #21 Exhibit J3, #22 Exhibit J4, #23 Exhibit K, #24 Exhibit L, #25 Exhibit M, #26 Exhibit N, #27 Exhibit O, #28 Exhibit P, #29 Civil Cover Sheets)(kw, ) |
| (11) Summons Issued as to AMIT PATEL, ASHISH PATEL, CHIRAG PATEL, DHRUBESH PATEL, HETAL PATEL, HETAL C. PATEL, JIGAR PATEL, SHIVANI PATEL, TEJAL PATEL, SEJAL PATEL, SAATH FIVE, INC.. Forwarded To: counsel on 8/8/18. (kw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
