THOMPSON v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY
| MARLENE THOMPSON |
| PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY |
| 2:2018cv04491 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| 1 Summons Issued as to PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY forwarded to US Marshal Service on 11/30/18. (rf, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER THAT CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE A SUMMONS. THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONS AND AMENDED COMPLAINT UPON THE DEFENDANT AT NO COST TO MS. THOMPSON. MS. THOMPSON WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE A USM-285 FORM SO THAT THE MARSHALS CAN SERVE THE DEFENDANT. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THAT FORM MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 11/30/18. 12/3/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(rf, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY filed by MARLENE THOMPSON.(jaa, ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION against PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY filed by MARLENE THOMPSON.(jaa, ) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM AS OUTLINED HEREIN. MS. THOMPSON IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ETC. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE MS. THOMPSON WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT FORM COMPLAINT FOR A PLAINTIFF FILING AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER FOR THIS CASE, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/24/18. 10/26/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE THOMPSON. *APPROPRIATE EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT SENT TO THOMPSON ON 10/25/18*(rf, ) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/24/18. 10/26/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF THOMPSON.(rf, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL filed by MARLENE THOMPSON..(jwl, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, filed by MARLENE THOMPSON.(jwl, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by MARLENE THOMPSON..(jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: THOMPSON v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARLENE THOMPSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
