FADID et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| RACHID FADID and AICHA YASSINE |
| JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MICHAEL R. POMPEO |
| 2:2019cv00620 |
| February 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT RESPONDENTS SHALL ANSWER PETITIONER'S COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 4/29/19. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 3/27/19. 3/27/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS NO LATER THAN THRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 2/26/19. 2/26/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd )
|
| Filing 2 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (fdc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 192455.), filed by RACHID FADID, AICHA YASSINE.(ahf) |
| Summons Issued as to MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. 4 Forwarded To: Counsel & 1 to AUSA on 2/13/2019 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
