STASIO v. 3M COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: ROBERT STASIO
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Case Number: 2:2019cv00663
Filed: February 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2019 Filing 8 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER FROM OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER [CTO-1]. RE: PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE U.S. JUDICIAL PANEL ON MDL, THE ACTION(S) ON THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE ARE TRANSFERRED UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1407 TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ORDER OF 4/3/19, AND, WITH THE CONSENT OF THAT COURT, ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE M. CASEY RODGERS. (jaa, )
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER TO MDL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 3/26/19. 3/26/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
March 26, 2019 Filing 6 STIPULATION Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to MDL by 3M COMPANY. (DISIPIO, BASIL)
March 11, 2019 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Jon Robb re: served Complaint and Summons of Aearo Technologies, LLC upon Deanne Bertram by Hand Delivery on 03/08/2019, answer due 3/29/2019. (PINTO, ROSEMARY) Modified on 3/13/2019 (tjd).
March 11, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed by Timothy Brown re: served Complaint and Summons for 3M Company upon Cathy Prescher, In-take Specialist c/o Registered Agent by Hand Delivery on 03/06/2019, answer due 3/27/2019. (PINTO, ROSEMARY) Modified on 3/13/2019 (tjd).
February 28, 2019 2 Summons Issued as to 3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 3/1/19 (jaa, )
February 28, 2019 Filing 3 Praecipe to Issue Summons of 3M Company and Aearo Technologies by ROBERT STASIO. (PINTO, ROSEMARY)
February 21, 2019 Filing 2 12(b) Procedural Order (CJL)
February 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE192555.) filed by ROBERT STASIO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(jaa, ) (Attachment 3 replaced on 2/21/2019) (jaa, ).
February 15, 2019 2 Summons Issued as to 3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 2/15/19 (jaa, )
February 15, 2019 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ROBERT STASIO. (jaa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STASIO v. 3M COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Represented By: BASIL A. DISIPIO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT STASIO
Represented By: ROSEMARY PINTO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?