ALEXANDER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
| JOHN ALEXANDER |
| CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ADAM HUBER, LT. GILDEA and SUPERINTENDENT HARRY |
| 2:2019cv02306 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CYNTHIA M RUFE |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Original record transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pa via inter-district transfer system. (fb) |
Filing 5
ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL TRANSFER FORTHWITH THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FOMRA PAUPERIS SHALL BE LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE TRANSFEREE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 5/31/19. 6/3/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(jpd, )
|
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by JOHN ALEXANDER. (ahf) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, GILDEA, HARRY, ADAM HUBER, filed by JOHN ALEXANDER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahf) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FOMRA PAUPERIS FILED BY JOHN ALEXANDER.(ahf) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JOHN ALEXANDER. (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
