ELLERBE v. THE PA GENERAL ASSEMBLY et al
| DERRICK J. ELLERBE |
| THE PA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, THE PA GOVERNOR, THE PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (SEPTA) |
| 2:2019cv03554 |
| August 6, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDERED THAT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1915, LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED; THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED; AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 8/28/19. 8/28/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 8/28/19. 8/28/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (SEPTA), THE PA ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE PA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, THE PA GOVERNOR, filed by DERRICK J. ELLERBE. (NO ENVELOPE INCLUDED).(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(ahf) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY DERRICK J. ELLERBE.(ahf) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by DERRICK J. ELLERBE. (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
