Porter v. A.H.P. Settlement Trust
| Joseph Elliott Porter |
| A.H.P. Settlement Trust |
| 2:2019cv04004 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 13 Case transferred in from District of South Carolina; Case Number 4:19-cv-02069. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 11
ORDER: The Court agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for further consideration. Signed by the Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 08/30/2019. (lsut, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/4/2019.]
|
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to #7 Report and Recommendation by Joseph Elliott Porter. Reply to Objections due by 9/3/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/4/2019.] |
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Joseph Elliott Porter, 3932 Horseshoe Road N, Unit 1C, Little River, SC, 29566 (dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/4/2019.] |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this case be transferred in the interests of justice to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for further handling. Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/02/2019. (dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/4/2019.] |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Joseph Elliott Porter.(dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/4/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A.H.P. Settlement Trust (Filing fee $400 receipt number SCX200016532), filed by Joseph Elliott Porter. Service due by 10/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Exhibit 1-AHP Trust (Trust) documents, #3 Exhibit 2-Power of Attorney, #4 Exhibit 3-Pretrial Order No.2662)(dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/4/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Porter v. A.H.P. Settlement Trust | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Elliott Porter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: A.H.P. Settlement Trust | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
