WALLACE v. SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL et al
| ALONZO WALLACE |
| SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2019cv04795 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT ALONZO WALLACE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BECAUSE THE FORM SUBMITTED DID NOT INCLUDE THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISONER'S INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT BALANCE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/7/19.11/13/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(kw, )
|
| Blank copy of application to proceed in forma pauperis (short form) mailed to pro se petitioner on 11/13/19. (kw, ) |
| Filing 4 Petitioner's Memorandum of Law in Support of Federal Habeas Corpus Relief. (fdc) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jl, ) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus together with statement in support of request to proceed in forma pauperis, filed by ALONZO WALLACE. (Attachments: #1 CASE FORMS)(jl, ) |
| Filing 1 ALONZO WALLACE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUERIS..(jl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
