SCOTT v. WILKIE et al
| CARON SUE SCOTT |
| HONORABLE ROBERT WILKIE, JR. and CORPORAL MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ |
| 2:2019cv05136 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOEL H SLOMSKY |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service by MATOYA HAMPTON re: served SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT upon MICHAEL CRESCENZ by PERSONAL SERVICE (jl, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service by MICHAEL JOHNSTONE re: served SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT upon ROBERT WILKIE by PERSONAL SERVICE (jl, ) |
| Filing 5 CARON SUE SCOTT MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO GET MY OWN ECF ACCOUNT..(jl, ) |
| Filing 4 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (mbh, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY filed by CARON SUE SCOTT.(jaa, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION against MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ, ROBERT WILKIE, JR ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE206165.) filed by CARON SUE SCOTT.(jaa, ) |
| 4 Summons Issued as to MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ, ROBERT WILKIE, JR, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: 3 PLAINTIFF AND 1 US ATTORNEY on 11/1/19 (jaa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
