HOMES v. SAUL
| NATASHA HOMES |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 2:2019cv05956 |
| December 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ELIZABETH T HEY |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Social Security Magistrate Consent by NATASHA HOMES.. (APPLEBAUM, SCOTT) |
| Filing 6 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(jl, ) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of David B. Goetz, Esq. by NATASHA HOMES. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-14020527.). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(APPLEBAUM, SCOTT) |
| Filing 4 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (nd, ) |
| Filing 3 Procedural Order 12/20/19 Entered and copies mailed and e-mailed. (jl, ) |
| Filing 2 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(jl, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/21/2020) (jl, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE208502.), filed by NATASHA HOMES. (Attachments: #1 CASE FORMS)(jl, ) |
| 3 Summons Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: 1 TO U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE, 2 TO SCOTT APPLEBAUM on 12/20/19 (jl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
