Niedzialowski v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: John Niedzialowski
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO INC
Case Number: 2:2019cv20025
Filed: January 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: HARVEY BARTLE
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2019 Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 Second MOTION to Dismiss (Omnibus) filed by John Niedzialowski. (HUMPHREY, DEBRA)
March 1, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Misrepresentation Claims) filed by MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.Memorandum and Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(SANGIAMO, DINO)
February 27, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by DINO S. SANGIAMO on behalf of MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP with Certificate of Service(SANGIAMO, DINO)
February 21, 2019 Filing 9 Second MOTION to Dismiss (Omnibus) filed by MCKESSON CORPORATION.Memorandum. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(Kurland, Thomas)
January 30, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by DEBRA J. HUMPHREY on behalf of John Niedzialowski (HUMPHREY, DEBRA)
January 18, 2019 Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of New York Eastern; Case Number 1:18-cv-06240. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
January 18, 2019 Filing 6 CERTIFIED COPY OF JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order CTO-21 - Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of August 2, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Harvey Bartle, III. (Marziliano, August) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
January 18, 2019 Filing 5 JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order CTO-21 - Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of August 2, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Harvey Bartle, III. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Marziliano, August) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
January 18, 2019 Case transferred to District of Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Marziliano, August) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
November 19, 2018 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
November 19, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Sharp summons, #2 McKesson summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
November 19, 2018 Case assigned to Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
November 7, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. by John Niedzialowski (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Merck & Co., Inc, #2 Proposed Summons Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, #3 Proposed Summons McKesson Corporation) (Humphrey, Debra) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
November 5, 2018 A completed Civil Cover Sheet was not filed - specifically page 2 of the document containing the NY-E Division of Business Rule 50.1(d)(2); the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to submit the Civil Cover Sheet (use the current form on the court's website) using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
November 5, 2018 Proposed summonses are rejected; the caption on each summons does not match the caption of the complaint; specifically, if you use "et al" you must attach a rider; the Clerk's Office cannot issue the summonses with an incorrect caption. Counsel is advised to submit completed proposed summonses in PDF fillable format using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]
November 2, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-10902533 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by John Niedzialowski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Merck & Co., Inc., #3 Proposed Summons Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, #4 Proposed Summons McKesson Corporation) (Humphrey, Debra) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 1/18/2019.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Niedzialowski v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP
Represented By: DINO S. SANGIAMO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION
Represented By: Thomas Philip Kurland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERCK & CO INC
Represented By: DINO S. SANGIAMO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Niedzialowski
Represented By: Debra Humphrey
Represented By: DEBRA J. HUMPHREY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?