MALDONADO-GOMORA v. ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
| ROCIO MALDONADO-GOMORA |
| ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., RANDALL FOGAL and RAYMOND CROMER |
| 2:2020cv02382 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Response to plff's answer to deft's partial motion to dismiss plff's complaint and motion for a more definite statement, filed by DEFTS ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., RAYMOND CROMER, RANDALL FOGAL. (kw, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY, [ECF 10] IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO DOCKET THE REPLY, WHICH WAS ATTACHED TO DEFTS' MOTION AS EXHIBIT A, [ECF 10-1]. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 6/24/20.6/24/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION for Leave to File REPLY BRIEF filed by ROCIO MALDONADO-GOMORA. (Attachments: #1 Brief)(SMALL, ROBERT) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File REPLY BRIEF filed by ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., RAYMOND CROMER, RANDALL FOGAL.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(WAERIG, BRIAN) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by ROCIO MALDONADO-GOMORA. (Attachments: #1 Brief)(SMALL, ROBERT) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., RAYMOND CROMER, RANDALL FOGAL.Brief, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(WAERIG, BRIAN) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by BRIAN W. WAERIG on behalf of ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., RAYMOND CROMER, RANDALL FOGAL with Certificate of Service(WAERIG, BRIAN) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by BRIAN W. WAERIG on behalf of ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., RAYMOND CROMER, RANDALL FOGAL with Certificate of Service(WAERIG, BRIAN) (FILED IN ERROR BY ATTY; ATTY TO REFILE) Modified on 6/16/2020 (md, ). |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.(WAERIG, BRIAN) Modified on 6/16/2020 (md, ). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ROCIO MALDONADO-GOMORA re: Calvin Coates served Summons and Complaint upon RAYMOND CROMER by Personal Service. RAYMOND CROMER served on 5/26/2020, answer due 6/16/2020. (SMALL, ROBERT) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ROCIO MALDONADO-GOMORA re: Calvin Coates served Summons and Complaint upon RANDALL FOGAL by Personal Service. RANDALL FOGAL served on 5/26/2020, answer due 6/16/2020. (SMALL, ROBERT) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ROCIO MALDONADO-GOMORA re: Calvin Coates served Summons and Complaint upon ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. by Personal Service. ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. served on 5/26/2020, answer due 6/16/2020. (SMALL, ROBERT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., RAYMOND CROMER, RANDALL FOGAL ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14305220.), filed by ROCIO MALDONADO-GOMORA.(SMALL, ROBERT) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ROCIO MALDONADO-GOMORA. (md, ) |
| Summons Issued as to ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., RAYMOND CROMER, RANDALL FOGAL. EMAILED To: COUNSEL on 5/21/20 (jaa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
