RODRIGUEZ v. HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION et al
| LUIS RODRIGUEZ |
| HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-25 and HYNUM LAW |
| 2:2020cv02671 |
| June 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ANITA B BRODY |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDREW M. LAMBERTON on behalf of HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION with Certificate of Service(LAMBERTON, ANDREW) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION.(TROY, PAUL) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION. HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION waiver sent on 6/10/2020, answer due 8/10/2020. (TROY, PAUL) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by PAUL C. TROY on behalf of HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION with Jury Demand and Certificate of Service(TROY, PAUL) |
| Summons Issued as to HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL ON 6/9/20. (rf, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by LUIS RODRIGUEZ. (md, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HYNUM PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-25 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14338678.), filed by LUIS RODRIGUEZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(COCCO, ROBERT) Modified on 6/9/2020 (md, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
