VELEZ v. YOUNG et al
| WILSON JUNIOR VELEZ |
| DOCTOR JOHN DOE, LPN K. MARTIN, CORRECTIONS OFFICER POLO and LIEUTENANT YOUNG |
| 2:2020cv02693 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter dated 7/2/20 by WILSON JUNIOR VELEZ (amas, ) |
Order #5 and Pro Se Guidelines #6 mailed to Wilson Junior Velez. (fdc)
|
| Filing 6 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT VELZ'S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS HIS COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AND HIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VELEZ'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 6/16/20. 6/16/20 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL )
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by WILSON JUNIOR VELEZ. (fdc, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE, K. MARTIN, POLO, YOUNG, filed by WILSON JUNIOR VELEZ. IFP PENDING. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Case Management Track Form)(fdc, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by WILSON JUNIOR VELEZ..(fdc, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS HIS COMPLAINT filed by WILSON JUNIOR VELEZ..(jaa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
