BOYD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Plaintiff: JAMIL BOYD
Defendant: JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS NOS. 1-10, POLICE OFFICER DAVID DOHAN, POLICE OFFICER THOMAS LACORTE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA doing business as CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Case Number: 2:2020cv03777
Filed: August 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: C DARNELL JONES
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2020 Filing 4 Affidavit of Service Returned Executed by JAMIL BOYD re: Susan Ryan served Summons and Complaint upon CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS NOS. 1-10 by Personal. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA served on 9/10/2020, answer due 10/1/2020; JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS NOS. 1-10 served on 9/10/2020, answer due 10/1/2020. (BAIRD, GRAHAM) Modified on 9/15/2020 (tjd).
September 14, 2020 Filing 3 Affidavit of Service Returned Executed by JAMIL BOYD re: Susan Ryan served Summons and Complaint upon THOMAS LACORTE by Personal. THOMAS LACORTE served on 9/10/2020, answer due 10/1/2020. (BAIRD, GRAHAM) Modified on 9/15/2020 (tjd, ).
September 14, 2020 Filing 2 Affidavit of Service Returned Executed by JAMIL BOYD re: Susan Ryan served Summons and Complaint upon DAVID DOHAN by Personal. DAVID DOHAN served on 9/10/2020, answer due 10/1/2020. (BAIRD, GRAHAM) Modified on 9/15/2020 (tjd).
August 4, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14468647.), filed by JAMIL BOYD.(BAIRD, GRAHAM)
August 4, 2020 Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID DOHAN, THOMAS LACORTE. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 8/4/20 (JL )
August 4, 2020 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JAMIL BOYD. (fb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOYD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS NOS. 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER DAVID DOHAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER THOMAS LACORTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA doing business as CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMIL BOYD
Represented By: GRAHAM F. BAIRD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?