MILLS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| SEAN MILLS |
| POLICE OFFICER FAGAN, POLICE OFFICER SANTIAGO, POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES, POLICE OFFICER MCCAULEY, JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LIEUTENANT ROBERT OTTO, POLICE OFFICER REILLY and DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THOMAS WRIGHT |
| 2:2020cv03824 |
| August 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE SHALL BE MARKED AS RELATED TO 15-1471, PLACED IN SUSPENSE, AND MARKED AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 8/6/20. 8/7/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14475565.), filed by SEAN MILLS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(ZEROUNIAN, VAZKEN) (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/6/2020) (lisad, ). |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by SEAN MILLS. (lisad, ) |
| Summons Issued as to FAGAN, CHRISTOPHER HULMES, MCCAULEY, ROBERT OTTO, REILLY, SANTIAGO, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS WRIGHT. E-mailed To: VAZKEN ZEROUNIAN, ESQ. on 8/6/2020 (dmc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
