STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. |
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC and WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION |
2:2020cv04870 |
October 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
ANITA B BRODY |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. re: William Tucker served Summons and Complaint upon WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION by Registered Agent. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION served on 11/18/2020, answer due 12/9/2020. (DE LUCA, DANIEL) |
Summons Issued as to WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 11/12/2020 (bw, ) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, filed by STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO..(DE LUCA, DANIEL) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. re: David Rojas served Summons and Complaint upon SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC by Personal Service. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (DE LUCA, DANIEL) |
Summons Issued as to SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 10/5/2020 (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14610320.), filed by STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(DE LUCA, DANIEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.