SMITH v. COMCAST et al
| CHARMANE SMITH |
| COMCAST and THE NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY |
| 2:2020cv05749 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER RE: MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED; THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED; THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 11/23/2020. 11/24/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED BY CHAMBERS AND E-MAILED.(sfl, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION RE: MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #1 . SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 11/24/2020. 11/24/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED BY CHAMBERS AND E-MAILED.(sfl, ) Modified on 11/24/2020 (sfl, ). |
| MAILED OUT PRO SE GUIDELINES #3 ON 11/23/20. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against COMCAST, THE NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, filed by CHARMANE SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CHARMANE SMITH..(bw, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CHARMANE SMITH. (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
