WADE et al v. MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. et al
MERCK & CO., INC. and JOYCE WADE |
MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. |
2:2020cv05750 |
November 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
HARVEY BARTLE |
P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP..(CONOSCENTI, CHRISTOPHER) |
Summons Issued as to MCKESSON CORP., MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP.. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 11/20/20 (JL ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by DINO S. SANGIAMO on behalf of MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. with Certificate of Service(SANGIAMO, DINO) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JOYCE WADE. (JL ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MCKESSON CORP., MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14719181.), filed by JOYCE WADE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service Merck & Co. Inc. /POS, #3 Certificate of Service McKesson Corp./POS, #4 Certificate of Service Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. /POS, #5 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track Form, #6 Designation Form Designation Form)(HUMPHREY, DEBRA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.