LUDWIG v. AVO MULTI-AMP CORPORATION et al
| MARK LUDWIG |
| JAMES G. BIDDLE COMPANY doing business as MEGGER, AVO MULTI-AMP CORPORATION doing business as MEGGER and MEGGER GROUP LTD. doing business as MEGGER |
| 2:2020cv06007 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| C DARNELL JONES |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MARK LUDWIG. AVO MULTI-AMP CORPORATION waiver sent on 11/30/2020, answer due 1/29/2021; JAMES G. BIDDLE COMPANY waiver sent on 11/30/2020, answer due 1/29/2021; MEGGER GROUP LTD. waiver sent on 11/30/2020, answer due 1/29/2021. (KARPF, ARI) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDREW OLCESE on behalf of MARK LUDWIG (OLCESE, ANDREW) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by TIMOTHY S. SEILER on behalf of MARK LUDWIG (SEILER, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AVO MULTI-AMP CORPORATION, JAMES G. BIDDLE COMPANY, MEGGER GROUP LTD. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14745504.), filed by MARK LUDWIG.(KARPF, ARI) |
| Summons Issued as to AVO MULTI-AMP CORPORATION, JAMES G. BIDDLE COMPANY, MEGGER GROUP LTD.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 11/30/2020 (bw, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by MARK LUDWIG. (fb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
