GREENIDGE v. LEHNOWSKY et al
GABRIEL GREENIDGE |
WELLPATH, LLC, MANFREY, STEPHEN WIENER, KATHRYN LEHNOWSKY, MAHESH SHRESTHA, T. FERGUSON, LEE HANUSCHAK, WILLIAM BAINBRIDGE, UNIT MANAGER SELLERS, SERGEANT ETTENGER, DEFRANSECA and K. SORBER |
2:2020cv06476 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GERALD A MCHUGH |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter from GABRIEL GREENIDGE *ENVELOPE ATTACHED* (rf, ) |
COPY OF DOC. NO. 6 AND IFP APPLICATION HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, GREENIDGE. (bw, ) |
Filing 6 ORDERED THAT GREENIDGE INDICATES IN HIS FILINGS THAT HE DOES NOT INTEND TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND THAT HIS FIANC SUBMITTED $400 TO THE CLERKS OFFICE ON HIS BEHALF AS PAYMENT OF THE FEES. (ECF NO. #1 AT #1 ECF NO. #5 . HOWEVER, ON DECEMBER 1, 2020, THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE INCREASED FROM $50 TO $52, MEANING THAT A TOTAL OF $402 IS REQUIRED TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE. THE COURT HAS LEARNED THAT THE CLERKS OFFICE RETURNED THE $400 PAYMENT ON DECEMBER 29, 2020 WITH A NOTATION THAT THE FEE HAD INCREASED TO $402. TO DATE, NOTHING HAS BEEN DOCKETED SHOWING THAT THE FEES HAVE BEEN PAID IN THIS CASE. 2 SECTION 1915(A)(1) PROVIDES THAT A COURT MAY AUTHORIZE COMMENCEMENT OF A LAWSUIT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF THE FEES BY A PERSON WHO SUBMITS AN AFFIDAVIT THAT INCLUDES A STATEMENT OF ALL ASSETS SUCH PRISONER POSSESSES THAT THE PERSON IS UNABLE TO PAY SUCH FEES OR GIVE SECURITY THEREFOR. IF GREENIDGE SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402 (THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. IF GREENIDGE MOVES TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE IS NOT REQUIRED TO FILE ANOTHER COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH 28 U.S.C. 1915(A)(2), BECAUSE HE HAS ALREADY SUBMITTED THAT PAPERWORK TO THE COURT. SEE ECF NO. #2 . THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH GREENIDGE WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER.3 GREENIDGE MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IF HE CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. GREENIDGES MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL ECF NO. #3 IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS PREMATURE. IF GREENIDGE FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 1/25/21. 1/25/21 ENTERED AND COPIES OF ORDER AND FORMS NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(jpd, ) |
Filing 5 Letter dated 1/3/21 by GABRIEL GREENIDGE (jaa, ) |
Filing 8 12/29/20 check number 9399 $400.00 filing fee was returned to plaintiff as the correct filing fee is $402.00. (td, ) |
DOC. 4 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, ) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by GABRIEL GREENIDGE..(bw, ) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by GABRIEL GREENIDGE. (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM BAINBRIDGE, DEFRANSECA, ETTENGER, T. FERGUSON, LEE HANUSCHAK, KATHRYN LEHNOWSKY, MANFREY, SELLERS, MAHESH SHRESTHA, K. SORBER, WELLPATH, LLC, STEPHEN WIENER, filed by GABRIEL GREENIDGE. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Complaint PT 2, #2 Complaint PT 3, #3 Complaint PT 4, #4 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by GABRIEL GREENIDGE. (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.