DELGADO v. RADDAD et al
| MICHAEL DELGADO |
| JOHN DOE #1, BLANCHE CARNEY, C/O RADDAD, C/O THOMPSON, SGT. DOMAN, JOHN DOE #2 and MITCHEAL FARRELL |
| 2:2021cv02534 |
| June 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN R PADOVA |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDERED THAT THE DEADLINE FOR DELGADOS COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURTS JUNE 11, 2021 ORDER IS EXTENDED TO AUGUST 30, 2021 AND IF DELGADO FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 7/28/21. 7/29/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, )
|
| DOC. 5 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, ) |
| PLEADING #4 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDERED THAT DELGADOS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 1) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11; IF DELGADO SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A SIGNED MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT SHOWING ALL DEPOSITS, WITHDRAWALS, AND A CURRENT BALANCE, FROM ANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH HE WAS CONFINED DURING THE TIME PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 2, 2020 TO JUNE 2, 2021. ALTERNATIVELY, DELGADO CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $402 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND DELGADO A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER; DELGADO MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IF HE CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE; IF DELGADO IS ULTIMATELY GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE WILL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. HE WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO THE RETURN OF ANY PAYMENTS MADE TOWARD THE FEE; IN LIGHT OF DELGADOS REPRESENTATION THAT HE IS EXPERIENCING DIFFICULTY OBTAINING A COPY OF HIS ACCOUNT STATEMENT, HE MAY PRESENT THIS ORDER TO AN APPROPRIATE PRISON OFFICIAL, WHO SHALL PROMPTLY SUPPLY HIM WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE TIME PERIOD SET FORTH IN THIS ORDER; IF DELGADO CANNOT OBTAIN THE NECESSARY RECORDS BUT STILL SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHOULD FILE AN AFFIDAVIT WITH THE COURT ATTESTING TO THE SPECIFIC STEPS HE TOOK TO OBTAIN THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT AS REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. 1915(A)(2) AND IF DELGADO FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 6/11/21.6/11/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, )
|
| PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, DELGADO. (bw, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BLANCHE CARNEY, DOMAN, MITCHEAL FARRELL, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, RADDAD, THOMPSON, filed by MICHAEL DELGADO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(bw, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MICHAEL DELGADO..(bw, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by MICHAEL DELGADO. (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
