PEELE v. OBERLANDER
TYRONE PEELE |
OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2021cv02785 |
June 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GENE EK PRATTER |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Proof of Service, filed by PRO SE PETITIONER TYRONE PEELE. "ENVELOPE ATTACHED"(kw, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND MR. PEELE A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254, BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF MR. PEELE INTENDS TO PURSUE THIS MATTER, HE SHALL COMPLETE THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM, SIGN THE COMPLETED PETITION, & RETURN IT TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/9/21. 7/12/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER TOGETHER WITH BLANK COPY OF PETITION.(kw, ) |
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE229007 (rf, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TYRONE PEELE. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.