CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP v. Boucher & James Inc. et al
Plaintiff: CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP
Defendant: Boucher & James Inc., Ross Boucher, DAVID R. JONES, Mark Eisold and Judith Stern Goldstein
Case Number: 2:2021cv04596
Filed: October 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: KAREN S MARSTON
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER THAT PLAITIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 11/9/21.11/10/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
November 9, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John F Mccaul on behalf of CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP (Mccaul, John)
November 3, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Cedrone on behalf of Mark Eisold with Certificate of Service(Cedrone, Mark)
November 3, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS F. BURKE on behalf of Ross Boucher (BURKE, THOMAS)
October 25, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Remand filed by Judith Stern Goldstein.Memorandum, Certificate of Service.(NOFER, FRANK)
October 20, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Boucher & James Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15488992), filed by Boucher & James Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(BONNER, KIMBERLY)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP v. Boucher & James Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP
Represented By: MARK F. HIMSWORTH
Represented By: John F Mccaul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boucher & James Inc.
Represented By: KIMBERLY A. BONNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ross Boucher
Represented By: THOMAS F. BURKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID R. JONES
Represented By: ANDREW L. RIEMENSCHNEIDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Eisold
Represented By: Mark Cedrone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judith Stern Goldstein
Represented By: FRANK S. NOFER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?