Volpini, et al v. Johns-Manville, et al
| Louis P. Volpini and Lucrecia Volpini |
| JOHNS-MANVILLE, Inc. Owens-Illinois, Owens-Illinois, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP and SPRAYCRAFT CORP |
| 2:2021cv60012 |
| October 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 70
ORDER THAT ANY RESPONSES TO THE MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR PURSUANT TO FRCP 60(a) SHALL BE FILED BY 11/4/21. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 10/28/21. 10/28/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
| Filing 69 PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(a)(mbh, ) |
| Filing 68 Case transferred in from District of Massachusetts; Case Number 1:83-cv-01926. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 67 Certified copy of MDL Conditional Transfer Order number 1253 in MDL Case 875 received from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania requesting transfer of case for consolidated pretrial proceedings. This case is transferred pursuant to Administrative Order No. 11, entered in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on August 15, 2006. (Jones, Sherry) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
|
Order of Judge Charles R. Weiner: motion to dismiss by Lucrecia Volpini, Louis P. Volpini allowed dismissing action against party Spraycraft Corp. See MML #1, #2, document #6865. (fmr) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.]
|
| Senior Judge Charles R. Weiner . Order of Dismissal. The Court Orders that the above entitled cases are dismissed without prejudice each party to pay their own costs. The statute of limitations is tolled, the cases are to remain status quo and the parties are to take all necessary action to complete settlement while keeping court advised. Counsel are to provide an initial status report 30 days from the date hereof; all dismissals will be final 60 days from the date hereof subject to reinstatment for good cause shown. See M.M.L. #1,2 #6805. (fmr) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
| Senior Judge Charles R. Weiner . Endorsed Order granting [0-1] motion to dismiss Owens Corning Fiberglas (SEE MML #1& #2, #6800) (lmh) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
| Motion by Lucrecia Volpini, Louis P Volpini, Owens-Corning to dismiss Owens Corning Fiberglas (SEE MML #1& #2, #6800) (lmh) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
| Interdistrict transfer to Eastern District of Pennsylvania, per July 29, 1991 transfer order of Multidistrict Litigation Panel in In Re: asbestos litigation (MDL-875). Case closed. (vah) Modified on 11/19/1991 [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
| Judge Rya W. Zobel . Endorsed Order granting [0-1] motion to dismiss. (See MML #1, #2, #6623) (fmr) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
| Judge Rya W. Zobel . Endorsed Order granting [0-1] motion to dismiss. (See MML #1, & #2, #6600) (fmr) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
| Motion by Owens Corning Fiberg to dismiss. (See MML #1, #2, #6623) (fmr) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
| Motion by Owens-Illinois, Inc, Owens-Illinois to dismiss. (See MML #1, & #2, #6600) (fmr) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
| Case to Judge Unassigned (vah) [Transferred from Massachusetts on 10/27/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
