REED v. U.S. PAROLE BOARD AGENCY et al
| ROBERT ANDREW REED doing business as ROBERT ANDREW REED |
| U.S. PAROLE BOARD AGENCY, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA doing business as DIR OF THE U.S. PAROLE BOARD, ERICK HELENIHI doing business as U.S. PAROLE EXAMINER, CHRIS WHITMEN doing business as U.S. PAROLE EXAMINER, MERRICK B. GARLAND doing business as ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES and ROBERT ANDREW REED CORP. SOLE |
| 2:2022cv00546 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed doc. #3 to Pro Se. (er) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (mbh) |
Filing 3
ORDER-MEMORANDUM THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CHANGE PETITIONER'S SERVICE ADDRESS TO USP HAZELTON, U.S. PENITENTARY, P.O. BOX 2000, BRUCETON MILLS, WV 26525; FORTWITH TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; AND CLOSE THIS CASE IN THIS DISTRICT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 2/28/22. 2/28/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh)
|
| DOC. 2 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mbh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ROBERT ANDREW REED, CORP. SOLE. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(mbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
