MURPHY v. STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
KEVIN MURPHY |
STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY |
2:2022cv01301 |
April 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOSHUA D WOLSON |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER THAT LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES SHALL APPEAR FOR A VIDEO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 6/9/2022 AT 10:00 AM BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON. FURTHER INFORMATION AND DEADLINES AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 5/20/2022. 5/20/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja) |
Filing 11 ORDER DENYING #6 PLAINTIFF KEVIN MURPHY'S MOTION TO REMAND TO THE PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FOR THE REASONS AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 5/11/2022.5/11/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja) |
Filing 10 ORDER STRIKING #9 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES BECAUSE A REPLY TO AN ANSWER IS PERMITTED AS A PLEADING ONLY IF THE COURT ORDERS ONE, FED. R. CIV. P. 7(A)(7). SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 5/02/2022. 5/02/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja) |
Filing 9 Response to Affirmative Defenses* by KEVIN MURPHY. (STRANICK, ROBERT) *STRICKEN PER COURT'S ORDER #10 DATED 5/02/2022; Modified on 5/2/2022 (ja). |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. (DOUGLAS, KATHERINE) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint together with Affirmative Defenses by STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.(DOUGLAS, KATHERINE) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand filed by KEVIN MURPHY.Motion Memorandum and Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(STRANICK, ROBERT) |
Filing 5 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (sg) |
Filing 4 Arbitration Certification by KEVIN MURPHY. (STRANICK, ROBERT) Modified on 5/20/2022 (lisad, ). |
Filing 3 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(sbt) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.(DOUGLAS, KATHERINE) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15834803), filed by STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.(DOUGLAS, KATHERINE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MURPHY v. STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KEVIN MURPHY | |
Represented By: | ROBERT F. STRANICK |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | KATHERINE COLE DOUGLAS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.