BAYNARD v. MASON et al
Petitioner: HENRY BAYNARD
Respondent: BERNADETTE MASON, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2022cv01651
Filed: April 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EDWARD G SMITH
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2022 Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PPE 241123 (fdc)
June 21, 2022 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by HENRY BAYNARD. (fdc)
June 21, 2022 Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 241123.), filed by HENRY BAYNARD.(fdc)
June 21, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by HENRY BAYNARD.(fdc)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO FURNISH BAYNARD WITH A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254 AND AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER, ETC. IF BAYNARD FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE COURT MAY DISMISS THIS CASE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 5/6/22. 5/6/22 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE).(er)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Order #3, prisoner complaint, IFP application and 2254 packet mailed to Baynard. (fdc)
May 6, 2022 Notice of Pro Se Guidelines (#2) mailed to Baynard. (fdc)
April 27, 2022 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (rf, )
April 27, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by HENRY BAYNARD., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, ENVELOPE ATTACHED (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP)(rf, ) Modified on 5/5/2022 (md).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BAYNARD v. MASON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: HENRY BAYNARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BERNADETTE MASON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?