BROWN v. RANSOM et al
| JAMES BROWN |
| KEVIN RANSOM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2022cv02362 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| DAVID R STRAWBRIDGE |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #9 TO PETITIONER ON 8/9/22. (jaa, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSD TO PETITION BY 11/3/2022. ANY REPLY PETITIONER WISHES TO FILE TO THE RESPONSE SHALL BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE RESPONSE. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 8/8/22. 8/8/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. ID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 6/21/22. 6/22/22 ENTERED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by KEVIN RANSOM, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA.Certificate of Service.Motions referred to DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE.(ERNST, KATHERINE) |
| Filing 7 State Court Record Received by Chambers of Judge Strawbridge on 7/14/22. (va) |
| State Court Record received. (rf, ) |
| DOC 6 MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE A RESPONSE AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW WITH SUPPORTING EXHIBITS PURSUANT TO RULE 5 FOL. 28 U.S.C. 2254 BY AUGUST 5, 2022; SHOULD PETITIONER WISH TO FILE A REPLY TO THE RESPONDENTS RESPONSE, HE MUST DO SO WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE RESPONSE; AND THE OFFICE OF THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 5, 2022 COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. JAMES BROWN, NO. CP-51-CR-9390-2011 (SENTENCED MAY 11, 2016). SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 6/21/22. 6/22/22 ENTERED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| Copy of #6 Order & #1 Petition e-mailed to PA Atty Gen & Philadelphia DA on 6/22/22. (va) |
| Copy of #6 Faxed to CCP Philadelphia on 6/22/22. (va) |
| E-mailed Petition and Order to Attorney General of PA and DA of Philadelphia. (er) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 3) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THIS MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/21/22. 6/21/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(er)
|
| MAILED OUT PRO SE GUIDELINES TO PETITIONER ON 6/21/22. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va) |
| Filing 3 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by JAMES BROWN. Envelope. (va) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE240965 SCI-DALLAS (va) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number PPE240965.), filed by JAMES BROWN. Envelope. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibits)(va) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
