MASSOUM ZADEH v. MAYORKAS et al
| SIAMACK MASSOUM ZADEH |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and KATHLEEN BAUSMAN |
| 2:2022cv02970 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Immigration: Naturalization Application |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Attorney), (Unopposed) filed by KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS.Certificate of Counsel, Certificate of Service.(SHERER, MARK) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MARK J. SHERER on behalf of KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS with Certificate of Service(SHERER, MARK) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service upon Defendants by Certified mail on 8/1/2022 (HYKEL CUDDY, RENEE) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: EMAIL TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND US ATTORNEY on 7/29/2022 (sg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16074909.), filed by SIAMACK MASSOUM ZADEH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(HYKEL CUDDY, RENEE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
