BRUNSON v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
CHARLENE BRUNSON |
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY |
2:2022cv03699 |
September 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOSHUA D WOLSON |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER THAT THE VIDEO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS RESCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 28, 2022 AT 4:00 PM BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 11/09/2022. 11/09/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement Form 7.1 by GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY.(SLOCUM, GRACE) Modified on 11/9/2022 (lisad, ). |
Filing 9 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL FILE A CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1(A), WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 11/04/2022. 11/04/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja) |
Filing 8 ORDER THAT LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES SHALL APPEAR FOR A VIDEO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 22, 2022 AT 3:00 PM BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON. FURTHER INFORMATION AND DEADLINES AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 11/02/2022. 11/02/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint together with with Affirmative Defenses by GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY.(SLOCUM, GRACE) |
Filing 6 Request for Default CHARLENE BRUNSON against GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY. (SIMON, MARC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE THAT, IF A REQUEST FOR DEFAULT IS NOT FILED BY NOVEMBER 4, 2022, THE COURT MAY ENTER AN ORDER DISMISSING THE CASE AGAINST THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S) FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. (ENTERED AND EMAILED, 10/20/2022).(ja) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by CERTIFIED MAIL re: served COMPLAINT SUMMONS AND DISCOVERY REQUESTS upon GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY by CERTIFIED MAIL on 09/21/2022 (SIMON, MARC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by GRACE LIM SLOCUM on behalf of GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY with Jury Demand(SLOCUM, GRACE) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 9/16/22 (JL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16180453.), filed by CHARLENE BRUNSON.(SIMON, MARC) (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/16/2022) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BRUNSON v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CHARLENE BRUNSON | |
Represented By: | MARC I. SIMON |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | GRACE LIM SLOCUM |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.