RIVERA v. LITTLE et al
WILLIAM RIVERA |
GEORGE LITTLE, JAIME SORBER, R. TERRA and J. TERRA |
2:2022cv03902 |
September 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOHN M YOUNGE |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
PAPER #13 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
Filing 14 Summons Issued as to GEORGE LITTLE, JAIME SORBER, J. TERRA, R. TERRA. Forwarded To: US MARSHAL on 11/22/22 (va) |
Filing 13 ORDER THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES. SERVICE OF THE SUMMONSES, THE COMPLAINT (ECF NO. #1 ), AND THE EXHIBITS THERETO (ECF NO. #2 ), SHALL BE MADE UPON THE DEFENDANTS BY THE U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO FORWARD RIVERAS COMPLETED FORM USM-285 (ECF NO. #4 ) TO THE U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE. ALL ORIGINAL PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO THE COURT IN THIS CASE ARE TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. RIVERAS MOTION FOR ORDER ON PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTIONS (ECF NO. #11 ), WHICH THE COURT CONSTRUES AS RIVERAS REQUEST FOR AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF HIS PENDING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (ECF NO. #3 ) AND HIS PENDING EMERGENCY MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE ORDER FOR PERMANENT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF NO. #6 ), IS GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION (ECF NO. #11 ) IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT RIVERA SEEKS A STATUS UPDATE ON THESE MOTIONS (ECF NOS. #3 & #6 ), WHICH, AS THIS ORDER MAKES CLEAR, REMAIN PENDING AT THIS TIME AND ARE UNDER CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT. THE MOTION (ECF NO. #11 ) IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT RIVERA SPECIFICALLY SEEKS A RULING ON HIS MOTIONS (ECF NOS. #3 & #6 ) AT THIS TIME. THESE MOTIONS REQUIRE FURTHER CONSIDERATION AND ASSESSMENT AND WILL BE DECIDED IN DUE COURSE NOW THAT THIS CASE WILL PROCEED TO SERVICE. RIVERAS PETITION FOR DISQUALIFICATION (RECUSAL) (ECF NO. #12 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 11/21/22. 11/22/22 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va) |
#4 USM-285 Forms forwarded to US Marshal on 11/22/22. (va) |
Filing 12 PETITION for Disqualification (Recusal) of Judge, by WILLIAM RIVERA. Certificate of Service. Envelope. (va) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by WILLIAM RIVERA. (va) |
Filing 11 MOTION FOR ORDER ON PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTIONS, filed by WILLIAM RIVERA. Brief. Certificate of Service. Envelope. (va) |
Filing 10 NOTICE re: Previous Filings & Request for Status Update on Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction, etc., by WILLIAM RIVERA. Envelope. (va) |
Filing 9 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 20003260 (sbt) Modified on 10/26/2022 (md). |
MAILED OUT PRO SE GUIDELINES ON 10/4/22. (jaa, ) |
Filing 7 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va) |
Filing 6 EMERGENCY MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE ORDER FOR PERMANENT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, filed by WILLIAM RIVERA. Certificate of Service. Envelope.(va) |
Filing 5 EXHIBIT- Waiver Forms by WILLIAM RIVERA. Envelope. (va) |
Filing 4 EXHIBIT- USM-285 FORMS, by WILLIAM RIVERA. Envelope. (va) |
Filing 3 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, filed by WILLIAM RIVERA. Envelope.(va) |
Filing 2 EXHIBITS by WILLIAM RIVERA. Envelope. (va) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GEORGE LITTLE, JAIME SORBER, J. TERRA, R. TERRA, filed by WILLIAM RIVERA. Envelope. FEE NOT PAID. NO IFP. (va) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.