DAVIS v. UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT et al
| TYSHEED DAVIS |
| UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT, PENNSYLVANIA BAR INSURANCE FUND, PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION, WORK COMPENSATION BUREAU, VITAL RECORDS DIV. OF PA, ALAN ROBINSON, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OFFICE OF COUNSEL, BUREAU ALCOHOL TOBACCO, INTERNAL AFFAIRS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT and RICHARD ROBIDOUK |
| 2:2022cv05213 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT IF DAVIS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE SHALL REMIT $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IN EVENT MR DAVIS PAYS THE FEES, CLERK SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES UNTIL SO ORDERED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 1/10/23. 1/10/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO DAVIS.(rf, )
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (rf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BUREAU ALCOHOL TOBACCO, INTERNAL AFFAIRS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OFFICE OF COUNSEL, PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION, PENNSYLVANIA BAR INSURANCE FUND, RICHARD ROBIDOUK, ALAN ROBINSON, UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT, VITAL RECORDS DIV. OF PA, WORK COMPENSATION BUREAU, filed by TYSHEED DAVIS., EXHIBITS, ENVELOPE ATTACHED *NO IFP. NO FEE PAID* (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
