DOE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Jane Doe L.S. and JANE DOE |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, John Doe Supervisors 1-5, Detective DONALD SUCHINSKY, Jim Doe Detective and Jen Doe Detective |
2:2023cv00342 |
January 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KAREN S MARSTON |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JANE DOE. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA waiver sent on 2/1/2023, answer due 4/3/2023. (ROSNER, DANIEL) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File under pseudonym filed by JANE DOE.memorandum cert of service.(ROSNER, DANIEL) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOC NO. #1 ), WHICH WAS FILED UNDER A PSEUDONYM, IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF MUST MOVE FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED VIA PSEUDONYM AND FILE A MEMORANDUM OF LAW EXPLAINING WHY SHE IS ENTITLED TO DO SO BY 02/17/2023. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 02/02/2023. 02/02/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(nd) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DONALD SUCHINSKY. Forwarded To: Plaintiff's Counsel on 1/31/23 (va) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16461545.), filed by Jane Doe L.S..(VAN NAARDEN, JOSHUA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.