SCHLINK v. THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SCHLINK
Defendant: THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, LLC
Case Number: 2:2024cv02630
Filed: June 14, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: KAI N SCOTT
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2024 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, LLC. Forwarded To: counsel on 6/14/24. (mbh)
June 14, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17541753.), filed by MICHAEL SCHLINK.(SCHIFF, LANE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCHLINK v. THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SCHLINK
Represented By: LANE SCHIFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?