WILLIAMS v. NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP et al
CHRISTEN WILLIAMS |
SEAN KILKENNY, JANE DOE, C. MATTHEW DEICHERT, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II, JOHN DOE III, NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP, JOHN DOE IV, JOHN DOE V, BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, CHIEF OF POLICE MICHAEL MARKOVICH, SEAN P. MCGEE and NORTH COVENTRY POLICE DEPT. |
2:2024cv06767 |
December 16, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOSHUA D WOLSON |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CHRISTEN WILLIAMS APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEE OR COSTS.(JL) |
Filing 5 CHRISTEN WILLIAMS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE..(JL) |
DOC. NO. 4 MAILED TO PRO SE ON 12/31/24. (sbt) |
![]() |
COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 W/ E-NOTICE CONSENT FORMS HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE (bw) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES 12/19/24 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED OUT (Attachments: #1 CONSENT TO EMAIL)(JL) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, C. MATTHEW DEICHERT, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II, JOHN DOE III, JOHN DOE IV, JOHN DOE V, SEAN KILKENNY, MICHAEL MARKOVICH, SEAN P. MCGEE, NORTH COVENTRY POLICE DEPT., NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP (IFP MOTION PENDING; NO FEE PAID), filed by CHRISTEN WILLIAMS.(JL) |
Filing 1 CHRISTEN WILLIAMS APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS.(JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.