BRISTOL OAK PROPERTIES, INC. v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
| BRISTOL OAK PROPERTIES, INC. |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MICHAEL CARROL and BENSALEM TOWNSHIP |
| 2:2025cv00504 |
| January 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Strike and Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by BENSALEM TOWNSHIP.Memorandum,Certificate of Service.(BELLWOAR, ANDREW) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Case Management Plan by BENSALEM TOWNSHIP. (BELLWOAR, ANDREW) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDREW J. BELLWOAR on behalf of BENSALEM TOWNSHIP (BELLWOAR, ANDREW) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL CARROL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 1/30/25 (bw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL CARROLL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-18038444.), filed by BRISTOL OAK PROPERTIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Designation Form, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5)(EISENBERG, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
