Wade v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS et al
Karim Wade |
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS doing business as DETENTION CENTER, Melvin Harris, Officer Harrison and John Doe Lieutenant |
2:2025cv02063 |
April 24, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MARY KAY COSTELLO |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE by Melvin Harris, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS re #1 Notice of Removal (Attorney), Case Designation Form (Hayes, Dorothy) |
Filing 3 Opt In Notice of Procedure to Consent to Random Magistrate Judge Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent)(sbt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW B. WEISBERG on behalf of Karim Wade with Certificate of Service(WEISBERG, MATTHEW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, Melvin Harris Certificate of Service. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-18240728), filed by PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, Melvin Harris.(Hayes, Dorothy) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/24/2025) (sbt). |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. DEFENDANT's counsel is directed to file DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Form is missing. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.