LONG v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: CHERYL A. LONG
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 5:2008cv05433
Filed: November 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Berks
Presiding Judge: EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; AND THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/18/2009. 11/23/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(tomg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LONG v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHERYL A. LONG
Represented By: BETH ARNOLD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?