REIFF v. MARKS et al
Plaintiff: JEFFREY DUNBAR REIFF
Defendant: CHAD T. MARKS, BOROUGH OF WEST READING, EDWARD FABRIZIANI and WEST READING BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Case Number: 5:2008cv05963
Filed: December 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Berks
Presiding Judge: THOMAS M. GOLDEN
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: No cause code entered

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MTOION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS III & IV, AND DENIED AS TO COUNTS V-XI, FOR THE SEASONS SET FORTH IN THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM OPINION. THE C LERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THE DOCKET IN THIS MATTER AS TERMINATING THE FOLLOWING PARTIES : EDWARD FABRIZIANI AND WEST READING BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 2/23/2011. 2/24/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
July 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER THAT THEDEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SPECIFICALLY, IT IS ORDEREDTHAT:ALL COUNTS AS TO DEFENDANTS CHAD T. MARKS AND EDWARD FABRIZIANI IN THEIR OFFICIALCAPACITIES ARE DISMISSED; COUNT TWO IS DISMISSED; COUNTS FIV E AND SEVEN ARE DISMISSED; COUNTS NINE AND TEN ARE DISMISSED AND DEFENDANT WEST READING BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT IS REMOVED AS DEFENDANT FROM THIS CIVIL ACTION; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES AS TO THE BOROUGH AT COUNT SIX IS DISMISSED; AND LASTLY, THE CLERK IS ORDERED TO REDACT THE HOME ADDRESSES OF DEFENDANTS MARKS AND FABRIZIANI, WHICH APPEAR IN PARAGRAPHS TWO AND FOUR OF THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS M. GOLDEN ON 7/13/09. 7/15/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REIFF v. MARKS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY DUNBAR REIFF
Represented By: SCOTT M. WILHELM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHAD T. MARKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOROUGH OF WEST READING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD FABRIZIANI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WEST READING BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?