REINERT v. LSI CORPORATION

REINERT v. LSI CORPORATION

Plaintiff:	BRENDA REINERT
Defendant:	LSI CORPORATION
Case Number:	5:2009cv03097
Filed:	July 13, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Allentown Office
County:	Northampton
Presiding Judge:	JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
Presiding Judge:	HENRY S. PERKIN
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 9, 2010	Filing 40 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM UNDER SECTION 510 OF THE EMPL OYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974 ("ERISA"), 20 U.S.C. SECTION 1140. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT TO THE EXTENT IS SEEKS SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ANY CLAIM UNDER SECTION 502 OF ERISA, 29 U.S.C. SECTION 113 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT LSI CORPORATION AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF BRENDA REINERT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 7/7/10. 7/9/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 9, 2010

Filing 40 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM UNDER SECTION 510 OF THE EMPL OYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974 ("ERISA"), 20 U.S.C. SECTION 1140. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT TO THE EXTENT IS SEEKS SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ANY CLAIM UNDER SECTION 502 OF ERISA, 29 U.S.C. SECTION 113 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT LSI CORPORATION AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF BRENDA REINERT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 7/7/10. 7/9/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REINERT v. LSI CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRENDA REINERT
Represented By:	DONALD P. RUSSO
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: LSI CORPORATION
Represented By:	SHANNON H. PALIOTTA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?