LE BLANC v. GUARINI et al
| DONNELLY J. LE BLANC |
| VINCENT GUARINI, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF |
| 5:2009cv03357 |
| July 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JACOB P. HART |
| JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANT HAS NEITHER SHOWN THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT NOR ESTABLISHED THAT REAS ONABLE JURISTS WOULD DISAGREE WITH THIS COURT'S DISPOSITION OF HIS CLAIMS. CONSEQUENTLY A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY IS DENIED. THE CLKER'S OFFICE SCHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 11/30/09. 11/30/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(jpd).
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THERE HAS BEEN NO SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT REQUIRING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. OBJECTIONS TO R&R DUE BY 10/29/2009. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 10/8/09. 10/8/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
