O'KEEFE et al v. ACE RESTAURANT SUPPLY, LLC et al
JOSEPH A. O'KEEFE and SIMMERIA CAFE' & BISTRO, INC. |
ACE RESTAURANT SUPPLY, LLC, KOREY BLANCK and NICK BLANCK |
5:2011cv01330 |
February 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Berks |
R. BARCLAY SURRICK |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT JUDGMENT BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY ENTERED: 1. IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ACE RESTAURANT SUPPLY, LLC; KOREY BLANCK; AND NICHOLAS BLANCK ON COUNTS ONE AND TWO OF THE COMPLAINT; 2. IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT NICHOLAS BLANCK ON COUNTS T HREE, FOUR, FIVE, AND SIX OF THE COMPLAINT; AND 3. IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF JOSEPH A. O'KEEFE AGAINST DEFENDANTS KOREY BLANCK AND ACE RESTAURANT SUPPLY, LLC ON COUNTS THREE, FOUR, FIVE, AND SIX OF THE COMPLAINT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,551.28. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 2/27/19. 2/27/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL [ECF #32] IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 3/27/17. 3/27/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED. FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(fdc) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO JOIN ADDITIONAL PARTIES [#9] IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 1/12/16. 1/12/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED. FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(fdc) (Main Document 15 replaced on 1/12/16) (fdc). Modified on 1/12/16 (fdc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.