TURI et al v. MAIN STREET ADOPTION SERVICES, LLP et al
| GUY TURI, MELISSA BALISTRERI-TURI, SHAUN NUGENT, CHRISTINE DENTON, LISA WELLS, SAM WELLS, LINDA WOOD, GEORGE WOOD, KELLEEN URBON and TODD URBON |
| MAIN STREET ADOPTION SERVICES, LLP, NINA HELLER, BOB MCCLENAGHAN and MARCIA DEL CARPIO |
| 5:2011cv03761 |
| June 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lancaster |
| PETRESE B. TUCKER |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS FIRST MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (DOC. 98) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 1/16/15. 1/20/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS HELLER AND MCCLENAGHANS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 15) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT DEL CARPIO'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 20) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/28/12. 10/1/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SES, UNREPS & EMAILED.(rf, )
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MELISSA AND GUY TURIS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE (DOC. 94 IN 09-5497) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/13/11. 9/16/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE & UNREP, E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
