HUYETT v. ASTRU
Plaintiff: ELAINA LYNN HUYETT
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 5:2011cv07228
Filed: November 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Berks
Presiding Judge: LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (DOC. NO. 15 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/24/2014. 7/24/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUYETT v. ASTRU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ELAINA LYNN HUYETT
Represented By: JAMES MICHAEL SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?