FUNAYAMA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| TOMOKO FUNAYAMA |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL LAWSON, ROBERT KLINEBURGER, RORY O. CONNAUGHTON, NICHIA CORPORATION (JAPAN) and NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION |
| 5:2013cv02667 |
| May 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lancaster |
| LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND OFFICER ROBERT KLINEBURGER. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDMENT CLAIM WILL PROCEED TO TRIAL AGAINST OFFICER MICHAEL LAWSON. THIS CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE HENRY S. PERKIN FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 4/9/15. 4/10/15 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, MAILED TO PRO SE.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS RORY CONNAUGHTON, NICHIA CORPORATION (JAPAN) AND NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST RORY CONNAUGHTON, NICHIA CORPORATION (JAPAN) AND NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION ARE DI SMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL LAWSON AND ROBERT KLINEBURGER ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 11/25/13. 11/25/13 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, MAILED TO PRO SE.(jl, ) (jl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
