WALLACE v. SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY

Plaintiff: CHARLIE WALLACE
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
Case Number: 5:2013cv03174
Filed: June 7, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Allentown Office
County: Northampton
Presiding Judge: PETRESE B. TUCKER
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 15, 2015 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER IS AFFIRMED; THE RELIEF REQUESTED BY THE PLAINTIFF IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 6/10/15. 6/15/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WALLACE v. SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLIE WALLACE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?