BUTLER v. LAMONT et al
JEFFREY BUTLER |
CONRAD LAMONT, JOHN/JANE DOE GUARDS #1-X, JOHN/JANE DOE SUPERVISORS #1-X, TODD BUSKIRK, ARNOLD MATOS, JOHN STOFFA and THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON |
5:2014cv03733 |
June 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Northampton |
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 65 ) IS GRANTED; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 8/15/17. 8/15/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, ) |
Filing 53 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT OF DEFENDANTS, LIEUTENANT CONRAD LAMON, TODD BUSKIRK, ARNOLD MATOS, JOHN STOFFA, AND THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER O RDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS TODD BUSKIRK, ARNOLD MATOS, JOHN STOFFA, AND THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF JEFFREY BUTLER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS "JOHN/JANE DOE GUARDS #1-X" AND "JOHN/JANE DOES SUPERVISORS #1-X" ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 1/8/2016. 1/8/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.